Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Tree frog Congo

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 7 Dec 2014 at 18:26:53 (UTC)

Reason: Image is 2,400× 3,200 pixels. It is a high quality image and I didn't found any issue.
Articles in which this image appears: Amphibian and Common reed frog
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians
Creator: Nick Hobgood

Support as nominator – Jim Carter 18:26, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Unsharp (camera jitter) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:26, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Support - It looks clear to me. Crisco, where does it look unsharp to you? In the leaves, or in the frog? Some of the leaves look a little unclear, but the frog looks clear to me. Do they both have to be sharp? CorinneSD (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- At full resolution, the camera jitter is quite clear (see, for instance, at the head and back; the crackleature [for lack of a better word] of the frog's back is fuzzy). Tough to shoot at 1/50; if Nick had gone up to ISO 200, he'd have gotten 1/80 or 1/100 and probably a sharper shot. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Camera shake --Muhammad(talk) 03:41, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose That Camera Is Too Shaky. National Names 2000 (talk) 05:12, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see what you mean now, Crisco. It's especially noticeable on the head of the frog. CorinneSD (talk) 16:05, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]