Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/USS Port Royal (CG-73)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

USS Port Royal (CG-73)[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 25 Sep 2012 at 09:52:15 (UTC)

OriginalUSS Port Royal (CG-73) of the US Navy
Reason
Large, good quality image of USS Port Royal (CG-73) that is used in multiple articles and lists as an example of a Ticonderoga class cruiser.
Articles in which this image appears
USS Port Royal (CG-73), Ticonderoga class cruiser, United States Navy, United States Navy ships, Equipment of the United States Armed Forces, Equipment of the United States Navy
FP category for this image
Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Vehicles/Water
Creator
US Navy Photographer's Mate 2nd Class Johnnie R. Robbins
  • Support as nominator --Pine 09:52, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak support. I like the picture, but the resolution isn't great. ComputerJA (talk) 20:18, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose There's a couple of dust spots in the clouds above the masts. Composition isn't ideal - too much water - a better aspect ratio or viewing angle would have brought out the ship better. --99of9 (talk) 23:47, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak oppose. I'm certainly not opposed to FPs being on the smaller side, but for such a large subject, I'd hope to see a larger resolution, unless there were mitigating factors (the ship has sunk or never docks, for instance). J Milburn (talk) 12:41, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Regretful Oppose The picture isn't in focus, way too soft. Dusty777 17:23, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose there is nothing great about the picture. It should really be a lot sharper and a lot bigger. --WingtipvorteX PTT 22:16, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per J Milburn et al gazhiley 12:30, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • wholly Oppose Per opposition above. Alborzagros (talk) 13:48, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --King of ♠ 17:11, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]