Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Yazd Atash Behram
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 17 Aug 2012 at 04:26:26 (UTC)
- Reason
- One of the nine Zoroastrian Atash Behram which house the highest grade of Fire. The picture is good quality and high EV
- Articles in which this image appears
- Fire Temple, Temple
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- Zenith210
- Support as nominator --Spongie555 (talk) 04:26, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support - I love the picture. The reflection creates wonder. --Tamravidhir(২০১২) 08:38, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support Armbrust, B.Ed. WrestleMania XXVIII The Undertaker 20–0 20:53, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose good EV angle-wise and composition-wise, but has chromatic aberration - e.g. on the lamps in the right and left, on the gate, on the trash can, and in several other places. Also the lighting seems quite harsh - compare to this photo (which has a bit better quality, except of flaws like noise, although this one has a bit better composition in EV terms). Most importantly, although it has potential good EV, there is no article about the structure itself, and the picture doesn't contribute significantly in illustrating the articles in which it is present: Fire Temple and Temple. Tomer T (talk) 05:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per Tomer T. Doesn't appear notable enough to have it's own article. gazhiley 14:22, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- It's not really relevant to this discussion - but why isn't the sturcture notable enough to have it's own article? Tomer T (talk) 16:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Just paraphrasing you fella... "there is no article about the structure itself," gazhiley 12:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- OK. But I guess that if someone will write such an article, the article will be kept. Tomer T (talk) 12:29, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
- Just paraphrasing you fella... "there is no article about the structure itself," gazhiley 12:57, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
- It's not really relevant to this discussion - but why isn't the sturcture notable enough to have it's own article? Tomer T (talk) 16:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 21:45, 17 August 2012 (UTC)