Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/2010 Shanghai fire/1
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 17:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Fails criterion 2: This article has multiple citation needed tags, and all sources are contemporary to the event (WP:PRIMARY).
- Fails criterion 3: The article is completely absent of any retrospective coverage or analysis after the sequence of events itself.
It's worth noting that its 2011 promotion was a quickpass that would not meet today's standards. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 23:33, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.