Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Entre a Mi Mundo/1

Entre a Mi Mundo

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Not listed From the community reassessment instructions "It is rarely helpful to request a community reassessment for an article which has not had a proper review: simply renominate it". That is the best course of action in this situation AIRcorn (talk) 03:53, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

The reviewer did not leave helpful comments for improvements on this article. Sh/e left the GA review template blanked with oppose signs. Sh/e only explained, in a one-short sentence, that the article is not near GA level (wow very helpful). This isn't the first time I complained about a GA reviewer. I'm not sure if its me personally and that's why no one likes to review any/the article(s) I nominate but I think I should get a fair review. Best, Jonayo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 00:28, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

First of all, your comment that you will fix it has not been done, not even about the copyright status of some files. Well, I did remove them. Secondly, I'm male, and the parser fontion {{GENDER:Ebe123|he|she|}} works perfectly. You could of asked for extra details, but it does need to get more compliance with WP:MOS. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 01:15, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Because you failed it without any comments for improvements besides the short sentence. I didn't know you was going to quick-fail it, that's why I said I was going to fix it. Secondly, I don't need to ask you to review the article on your talk page, if you started the review yourself. Best, Jonayo! ^{Selena 4 ever} 01:24, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

While I agree that the comments left are not very helpful, a community review is unlikely to yield anything in this case. Your best bet is to take Ebe123 up on his offer of more details, fix what you can and then renominate it at WP:GAN. AIRcorn (talk) 05:41, 3 February 2012 (UTC)