Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Glasgow, Paisley, Kilmarnock and Ayr Railway/1
Glasgow, Paisley, Kilmarnock and Ayr Railway[edit]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. —Femke 🐦 (talk) 18:55, 8 February 2023 (UTC)
Goodness this article is bad. There are entire sections that are unsourced such as.
- Development under the Glasgow and South Western Railway
- Topography
- 1994 - present: Privatisation and current operations
And is this even written well? There's sections called
- A resilient mood; but then collapse
- Regaining momentum
- The Glasgow and South Western Railway is formed
This article seems to have a lot of problems. This will take a lot of effort to fix. Onegreatjoke (talk) 16:13, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delist. The article was assessed as GA way back in June 2008. Since then it's had the usual here-and-there editing, except for one of Afterbrunel's throw-everything-away-and-start-again expansions in December 2014. This, I believe, means that WP:GAC#5 is no longer met. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:47, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delist per Onegreatjoke. the stability criterion is: "it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute". That does not apply here. Femke (alt) (talk) 09:06, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delist per Onegreatjoke. This is an artifact from the early days of Wikipedia, and no longer meets our expectations for a good article. Unless someone quickly commits to serious improvements, this should not maintain GA status. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:32, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.