Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Neerja/1

Neerja[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • GAN review not found

Result: No consensus. Actually, I wanted the article to be nominated for GAN. But I had by mistake nominated the article for GAR, because I was confused with GAN and GAR. So I am myself closing the reassessment. ЖunalForYou (☎️|✍) 04:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to nominate this article for GAR because the article is in a good condition. On the other the article is a biographical film about Neerja Bhanot. The article is long enough and meets GAR criteria. I think minor improvements would be required for the article. ЖunalForYou (☎️|✍) 06:01, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Is this a GAN or GAR? 45.121.117.171 (talk) 12:53, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@45.121.117.171: Thanks for telling. Earlier I didn't know what is GAN and GAR. Now I've removed the GAR template from the article's talk page and added GAN template. ЖunalForYou (☎️|✍) 18:11, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]