Wikipedia:Peer review/82nd Academy Awards/archive1

82nd Academy Awards[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because this list could be a FL and I want to know what is wrong.

Thanks, Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 05:25, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Everything seems to be in order with the article/list; but a few references are not properly formatted and reference number 26 does not seem to be a reliable source and reference number 7 (Digital Spy) is not considered a reliable source. Also in the "Submitted films qualified for consideration for nomination" section I think it would be easier to read without the red link and I also think the article/lists lead does not completely summarize the pages content, the page is over 76 bytes long so the lead should be about three paragraphs long. Granted, I haven't gone over this article word for word so there could be other problems with this article that I can not identify. Other then the problems I've listed, this article appears to be FL status. Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 09:09, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

number 26 does not seem to be a reliable source — I'll ask to other users

reference number 7 (Digital Spy) is not considered a reliable source — Done changed to Telegraph Daily

the lead should be about three paragraphs long. — ~~Doing...~~ I think it's Done

Thanks Crystal. Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 05:31, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome : ) Crystal Clear x3 [talk] 08:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved issues, Jrcla2 (talk)

:Minor correction In the "Nominations and awards" subsection, the color key provided has an asterisk in the green for Best Picture Winner and a cross in the yellow for Best Picture nominee, yet in the chart itself there are no asterisks or crosses. Unless it's purely color-coding and that's it, symbols need to be added or else they're there for no reason. Jrcla2 (talk) 20:35, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 00:11, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Better, but symbols need to be superscripted (<sup></sup>) right next to the words they are demarcating. Jrcla2 (talk) 04:01, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Done Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 04:16, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alrighty then. I didn't scour the article for mistakes or possible improvements, I just happened to notice that one thing. It's been resolved. Jrcla2 (talk) 04:57, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]