Wikipedia:Peer review/ANAK Society/archive1

ANAK Society[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
This article was recently promoted to GA status, an achievement I'm proud of considering it was previously a deleted AfD. I'm hoping to get it to FA status pending the results of this peer review. I'm especially looking for feedback regarding the references, which may need special attention because the article deals with a secret society. I'm also not sure about the image placement or the sequence of the different sections.

Note: I'm not affiliated with the ANAK Society in any way.

Thanks, MaxVeers (talk) 06:10, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually thinking that it looked distinctly FA-quality. However, I'm sure somebody has some ideas for it before we throw it to the sharks. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 07:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 15:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]