Wikipedia:Peer review/Air discography/archive1

Air discography

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because having performed much work on the article, I would like to nominate the article as a featured list soon. Any additional fixes and comments before I proceed with a nomination would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks, Holiday56 (talk) 10:13, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

• Why put compilation album in parentheses?, also numbers does not follow WP:ORDINAL which states "As a general rule, in the body of an article, single-digit whole numbers from zero to nine are spelled out in words..." Best, Jona^{talk to me} 01:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • No compilation albums are mentioned in the article. If you are actually talking about the collaborative album, then it is placed in parentheses in the lead due to the fact that it has its own separate subsection in the studio albums section. I've changed the single-digit whole numbers to words now. Holiday56 (talk) 09:46, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Comments

• Discography needs to be wikilink
  • Based on my knowledge of featured lists, "discography" does not actually need to be wikilinked. Holiday56 (talk) 09:15, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
• You could use a model article to help you (Mariah Carey albums discography)
  • I've use general featured list discography articles as models for my work on this article. Holiday56 (talk) 09:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
• No need for references in the lead (for chart performances, and certifications) since they are covered in the article body
  • Editors at peer reviews and featured list nominations have told me to reference chart positions in the lead, and I have continuously done so. Many featured lists reference charts in the lead, and as such I feel that it would be better to keep chart references in the lead. Holiday56 (talk) 09:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
• Too many instances of "the album" and "the single" needs a variety
• The prose could be better, have you tried asking GOCE? Other than that, the article looks good. Best of luck, Jona^{talk to me} 13:34, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
  • I'll undergo work on the prose, hopefully to add more variation to its structure. Holiday56 (talk) 09:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)