Wikipedia:Peer review/Aspasia/archive1

Aspasia[edit]

I just finshed the rewriting of the article (so, I'm sorry for any typos or other deficiencies). I think the article has the potential to become GA or FA. I would like to have the assistance and the suggestions of other Wikipedians, especially in terms of prose, style and content.--Yannismarou 20:44, 9 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wow. Tremendous article. Definitely has potential for FA, and in many ways it's already there. Just a few things to push it along, however: the Historicity section should either be expanded or merged with one of the other sections. Right now it's too short. The Lysicles red link in the lead should probably get an article. This can be a stub so it shouldn't take long. It's just normally not good to have red links in the lead. I'm sure other editors can think of something else, but I really thought this was a phenomenal article. Very very interesting and enlightening; I'd never heard of this woman before, but I'm glad I have now! Good job.UberCryxic 04:00, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Expanded the last section. Created Lysicles' article.--Yannismarou 08:32, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If this were an FA vote I would support it. My only concern is that the first quote box cites Aristophanes. Readers who don't understand his work will probably miss the farcical tone. Durova 02:45, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clarified that Acharnians is a comedy. I hope it is better now. I'm open to any further comments (prose, style, content).--Yannismarou 15:03, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]