Wikipedia:Peer review/Backstreet Boys discography/archive1

Backstreet Boys discography

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because i think it meets the FL criteria

Thanks, Skaterboy2012 (talk) 17:34, 17 November 2010 (UTC)

Finetooth comments: This looks pretty good but it not quite ready for FLC yet. Here are a few suggestions for further improvement.

• I would unlink "Backstreet Boys" in the infobox to avoid double bolding. WP:MOSBOLD includes a relevant guideline under "Contraindications".  Done

• The image license for File:Backstreet Boys Concert 2.jpg is incorrect. If you click through to the Flickr source and click on the "Some rights reserved" line under "License", you will see that the original was licensed with a "no commercial use" (NC) restriction. That means it should not have been uploaded to the Commons and can't be used by Wikipedia. The license problem is not your fault; still, you can't use the image. Perhaps you can find another that has no NC restriction, or perhaps you can convince the photographer to change the license to CC-by-SA without the NC clause.

• Should the music-video total be added to the infobox?  Done

• The dab tool at the top of this review page finds one link (Aria) that goes to a disambiguation page instead of the intended target.  Done

• The lead might be improved by moderate expansion. For example, it could say more about singles, compilation albums, and music videos.

• Would the singles certifications be more effectively presented as part of the "Singles" table? Jamelia discography, a featured list, combines them and might provide a model to imitate.  Done

• Would "Videos" look better in a table? Alice in Chains discography, a featured list, might provide a model. Maybe more data about these videos could be added? Publisher? Running time? Subject matter? Awards, if any?

• Citation 35 is missing the author date (Fulton, Rick), and Daily Record should be in italics. Similar problems occur in Citation 29, where Billboard needs italics, and the missing author is Dominic Pride. Citation 47 and 48 have date formats that differ from most of the rest of the citations. In the reference section, the date formatting needs to be consistent throughout. Citation 107 seems malformed and incomplete.  Done

I hope these suggestions prove helpful. If so, please consider reviewing another article, especially one from the PR backlog at WP:PR; that is where I found this one. I don't usually watch the PR archives or check corrections or changes. If my comments are unclear, please ping me on my talk page. Finetooth (talk) 18:57, 26 November 2010 (UTC)