Wikipedia:Peer review/Cannonball Jellyfish/archive1
Cannonball Jellyfish[edit]
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for November 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because…
I want overall review of my article.
Thanks, Desert fox2009 (talk) 02:33, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
Comments by Sillyfolkboy – I'll start off by saying this is a good, solid basis for an article and it's developing well. You should look to continue expanding it. After taking a quick look at Blackbird for reference, there are certain pieces of information that need to be included:
- Who was the first to describe the species and when? (etymology etc)
- Give a description of the creature, using lengths and weights where applicable.
- Is the family Stomolophidae so limited or is Wikipedia coverage poor? If it is limited then there is sure to be more information expanding on its separate taxonomy etc.
- What is its conservation status? (threatened? common?)
- What are the main predators of these animals?
Also there are a couple of mistakes and omissions I noticed:
- Typos: "Although Somolophus Mealegris"
- Reference 7 states that this is also known as the cabbage head jellyfish. Make a note of the alternate name.
- Remember to always list the sources publisher – sources 2 and 7 are missing this info.
- What's with the strange citation at the bottom of the page?
You can remove the "cnidarian stub" template now too as this is more of a start class article. Hope this gives you some ideas on what to do next. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 06:27, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
If you found this peer review helpful please consider doing one yourself. Choose one from the backlog, where i found this article or take a look at WP:Peer Review.