Wikipedia:Peer review/Cello/archive3

Article (Edit|History) • Article talk (Edit|History) • Watch article • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 04:31, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A few minor quibbles from someone not very familar with the instrument:

Boxwood is a disambiguation page, which specific wood does the article refer to?
Schoenberg, another disambiguation page
"An average cello bow is 73 cm long (shorter than a violin or viola bow) 3 cm high (from the frog to the stick)" The definition of "frog" should be here (currently it is explained in a later paragraph)
There are no references past the "Development" section; this is one thing that definately needs fixing before a Featured Article Nomination.

That is all, good article! -Running On Brains 18:54, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]