This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I think it's pretty good, and would like to know if there's anything I need to do to move it further up the quality ladder.
Thanks, bd2412T 21:15, 8 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APRt 02:14, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, I'll check up on those. bd2412T 02:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Not much I can do with these. Is there anything else? bd2412T 23:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
