Wikipedia:Peer review/Cortana (software)/archive1

Cortana (software)[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to get this article to FA. However, I have not made any FA articles. Could anyone give comments/help/guide me? Thanks, Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 10:26, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I checked your article and found some things that might bother reviewers:

There are too many images. Even if they are free the clash a lot with each others as well as the text.
The lead has some citations. See WP:Lead; unless you are citing controversial info, I recommend you removing them since they are mentioned in the body.
Avoid short paragraphs like the ones from Expansion to other platforms.
You could also combine or expand some sections from Functionality like Design which is really small.
- Same with Technology and updating.
In Regions and languages, I would suggest removing the flags. They are quite redundant as we already see country right next to them. Also, they could be WP:Undue weight
Lastly, some citations are lacking accessdate.

I hope my comments helped you. I also put a peer review here so I would appreciate you could give me feedback. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 22:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Tintor2. Sorry for not being able to peer review yours. Only just noticed it, and I'm not the best content creator. Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 16:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]