This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because there's been a lot of work done on it recently - I know it's not perfect and I have my own idea of what needs to be done, but would appreciate some objective comments.
A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APRt 02:19, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
