Wikipedia:Peer review/Elisabeth Geleerd/archive1

Elisabeth Geleerd

I've listed this article for peer review because I'm curious about FAC potential. This article is on the short side (~1200 words), though I've just expanded it a little further with some recently discovered sources. I was inspired by the current PR for Florence Petty, another historical biography in a similar length range. The article passed GAN in late 2021 and, I feel, has been on an upwards course since; it also gets a fair amount of interest by the standards of niche subjects, due to twice-yearly WP:OTD main page appearances.

Thanks, Vaticidalprophet 12:57, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

1. Many editors don't find Worldcat profiles to be a reliable source; see RSN archives. The JWA article is probably a better source for a publications list
2. There are some reviews of her book, why aren't they cited?

(t · c) buidhe 22:44, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Buidhe, it's been a couple weeks, but these should both be addressed -- I've re-cited the publications to JWA, and added a little about The Child Analyst at Work's reviews. The sentence for it currently feels a little clunky, because I was trying to avoid naming the reviewers (none of them were people who seemed to have obvious enough 'credentials' to mention in-text, and I don't like the practice of just naming a random article-less person as a reviewer without context). Will figure out how best to handle that one. Vaticidalprophet 23:06, 11 July 2023 (UTC)