Jump to content

Wikipedia:Peer review/Fatima Jinnah Dental College/archive1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fatima Jinnah Dental College[edit]

Hi, I'm new and I created an article on the college I attend here in Karachi. I have ideas for several other new articles in my mind, but I wanted to get this one checked before I proceeded with the others. I've tried to keep in mind all the criteria of good article in mind when creating this, but since I'm new, I'm sure they'll be things I can improve on, so I'll appreciate a review. Thanks in advance.Zainub 13:24, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • You're doing a great job so far. The article does needs more references, though. It's recommended to place references inline using <ref> note goes here </ref> format - the references will then be displayed if you put the <references/> tag toward the end of the article. (See m:Cite.php for more.) After adding more references, this might make a good GA candidate. To make FA, however, it would need to be longer. —Scott5114 15:58, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • Thanks for the suggestion, I've made many in-line references now. I've made many references from a copy of the college prospectus I have with my self in print, which rather strangely is not available online at the college website, I haven't been able to link to specific URLs in that case, but have nevertheless specified the exact source of the content (down to page number!). Also, I tried to use the code specified in the Help Pages to group together content having the same refrence, but couldn't, it always ended up giving some error. I'll try again tomorrow morning, may be it was down to my Internet connection, which hasn't been behaving all the well off late. I've also added section headings and expanded the article over all, so more comment on how I'm progressing would always be welcome. And thanks again. Zainub 01:48, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  • I've fixed the references for you - see this diff so you can see how to get it set up so that multiple references work. —Scott5114 05:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]