Wikipedia:Peer review/Fayetteville, Arkansas/archive1

Fayetteville, Arkansas[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

The Fayetteville page has been on the cusp of being a good article before. The city is a landmark in Arkansas, and I'd love to see the article's greatness match the city's. Scrutinize to your heart's desire. I believe more content can be added; I'm just unsure what can be added.

Thanks, Hair^Talk 20:10, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late review Hair. These are some issues I found:

Avoid using citations in the lead unless you are using controversial information
Is it possible to split the lead into a third article? It would avoid making the text clash with the infobox.
Some paragraphs are unsourced like the ones in like in "Settlement through Antebellum period". Per WP:Verifiability everything requires references.
In Geography there is clash between text bosses and images. I would suggest removing the image and paraphrase it.
There are more sections with unsourced paragraph.

Hope this helps. I'm pretty sure the article will become GA material once every section is sourced. I also have my own peer review here and I would appreciate if you could provide feedback. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 15:11, 28 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]