Wikipedia:Peer review/Great Barrier Reef/archive1
As this is included in the Wikipedia:Wikipedia-CD/Download project, and is a few years old, I'd really like this to be able to get up to 'good article' standard, at least. I'd like some suggestions on what's missing, clarity of the article, and general improvements that can be made. Thankyou very much! - Malkinann 04:25, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
- The History sub-section & point about the Kimberleys are out-of-context & not relevant to the Age section. Here's a direct link to the Age section as I originally made it back in February.--Funhistory 21:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for responding, Funhistory. I thought that the point about the Kimberleys was interesting for comparision's sake, or if the reader was interested about other reefs in Australia. I agree that the History subsection is a bit awkward - maybe it needs to be merged into "Managing the GBR"? (which could possibly be renamed "Human use and management of the GBR"?) - 220.237.30.150 00:30, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
- Needs to be much more comprehensive. I'd concentrate on several sections: history, geography, conservation and tourism. A worthy candidate for ACOTF. michael talk 13:44, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
I'm not sure that I can put it up for ACOTF, as it's fairly comprehensive already and fairly old. - Malkinann 06:26, 29 June 2006 (UTC)