I've listed this article for peer review because it has passed GA class and has had a lot of content added to it, see this diff. I want some feed back as to what it still currently needs, or what is "wrong" with it. Thanks, Dreamy§ 23:12, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APRt 04:33, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have fixed what can be fixed from that, anything else? Dreamy§ 15:55, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
