Wikipedia:Peer review/Hulton Abbey/archive1

Hulton Abbey

I've brought this article up from stub level , with a view to at least nominating it for GA status. I'd appreciate suggestions for improvement on content and wording in particular, but any pointers would be great!

Thanks, Sotakeit (talk) 19:12, 19 February 2016 (UTC)

What a great topic. Happy to take a look through.

• Some free images from Geograph- here, here and here. I'm guessing these are the right place?
• "Throughout its life" Is "life" the right word?
• "however due to its poor condition it is considered Heritage at Risk" Included on the Heritage at Risk list, perhaps?
• "Normacot and Bucknall" Are these settlements? Links would be good- don't be scared of redlinks.
• "advowsons" Not a term in my vocabulary! A link or explanation would be good.
• I've tagged a digambiguation link which needs fixing.
• The fact about the fine being reduced is repeated twice in quick succession
• Why put the income/fine in scarequotes?
• You could cite Lewis's research directly.
• There are lots of hits on Google Scholar, as is quite predictable. If you're having trouble accessing stuff, I may be able to help, and WP:RX may be able to help you with those I can't get.

That's all that's jumping out at me. You may want to talk to Ealdgyth (talk · contribs) or Peter I. Vardy (talk · contribs), who specialise in English medieval history and listed buildings respectively. I commend you for taking on the topic! Josh Milburn (talk) 18:29, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

@Sotakeit: In case you missed this. Josh Milburn (talk) 21:05, 16 March 2016 (UTC)