Wikipedia:Peer review/Intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy/archive1

Intensive short-term dynamic psychotherapy

Review is requested from two sorts of individuals. First, those with expertise in psychodynamic psychotherapies, to make sure I have fairly and accurately used technical terminology. Second, those with a general interest in high quality rhetoric and prose, to make sure I have written well and am neither too prolix, nor too jargon-laden.

I thank all those who take an interest in these matters, and all comments will be carefully considered.

--Robert Tarzwell 03:15, 26 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article. Clear description of technique and purposes.

Get rid of red links. I fixed some links, and there might be a few more that could be improved. Look for red links and either try other variants (like I did for a couple of your red links) or write a brief definitional stub.
If you are going to link names that you think deserve an article, link full names even if you just want the last names in the text.
Make the relationship of isdp and cog-behav therapy clearer. Is this a type of cog-beh or are they alternative systems? If cog-beh is the current standard, what are the principal differences? alteripse 12:46, 29 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback! I have replied in more detail on your talk page. All your suggested edits have been incorporated, and I believe they were right on the money. --Robert Tarzwell 18:43, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]