Wikipedia:Peer review/Iron and Steel Industry in India/archive1
Appearance
Toolbox |
---|
![]() | This peer review discussion has been closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because… I would like to clear the issues associated with the article
Thanks, Bismuth 123 (talk) 11:44, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Review What an interesting page, Bismuth 123! I quite like the overview of the history of steel and iron in India. Here are some thoughts from the review:
- The article would benefit from the tables being included in written text, rather than a series of tables, which are difficult to read.
- The first half of the article would benefit from more citations
- The history section is really interesting
- The article overall would benefit from more Wikilinks so that readers can go to articles about related areas (such as about the major steel companies and regions of India)
- Most articles are titled in lowercase except for names, so this article should probably be titled Iron and steel industry in India.
Overall it's clear you've put a lot of effort into this article. Nice work. --Tom (LT) (talk) 23:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Review As Tom (LT) said, an interesting article indeed. I think a few things could be done for the benefit of the article.
- Under exports, if such data is available, break down yearly export quantities as the import section does.
- A picture in the lede would do well.
- Although there is a bibliography, inline citations for the number-heavy portions would be good.
- Some areas could use copy editing, so requesting that at Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors would go a long way.
- I reiterate Tom (LT)'s #5
Quite an informative article overall. Ergo Sum 21:56, 20 January 2016 (UTC)