This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I would like feedback on some extensive edits that I have been doing.
I would like feedback on what needs to be worked on and also any problems with layout.
A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APRt 23:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I would like a manual review please also. -- Jamie jca (talk) 17:30, 23 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
