Wikipedia:Peer review/List of Oklahoma Sooners in the NFL Draft/archive1

List of Oklahoma Sooners in the NFL Draft[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
While I was waiting on my other peer review, I threw this list together basing it off of List of Arkansas Razorbacks in the NFL Draft. I have developed this list from scratch within the last week and would like any advice on what needs to be done to improve it. I have tried to make sure it is well sourced and thorough. Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks, ↔NMajdan•talk 22:01, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Looking over it, I myself cannot see any major errors. The list is very thorough, and was understandable to someone like myself who does not even understand football all that well. While I haven't verified your citations, I noticed that every note is cited. I have very few suggestions, but believe they may be of service:

A right indented table of contents would serve well, and allow you to take the links to the References and Notes section out of the compact TOC.
"The 2010 NFL Draft will be held April 22-24, 2010 at the Radio City Music Hall in New York City, New York." should be referenced.
Can the table be made sortable? I'd like to be able to see, for example, all the players that were first round picks. Every column except for names, notes and reference is easily sortable.

Other than that, I can't see anything else. Good work! - ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ ^τ _¢ 19:27, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comments. I added an additional TOC and removed the References link from the "Jump To" TOC however, I feel the Notes section was still important enough to the main table to leave it in the "Jump To." I added a citation of the 2010 Draft. It would be very difficult to make this sortable as I would have to get rid of the multi-row header and get rid of the multi-row year columns (so instead of one 1940 cell covering nine players, there would be nine 1940 cells). Same change would have to be made to the references column.—NMajdan•talk 16:47, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]