Wikipedia:Peer review/List of extreme weather records in Pakistan/archive1

List of extreme weather records in Pakistan

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review i want to make it better, and in near future i will nominate this article for Featured list candidate. Thanks

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 16:01, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Comment: I am glad that each entry is sourced. There are only a few suggestions I would like to make.

1. Although floods are now an yearly phenomenon because of presence of flood plains in Pakistan, they have become part of climate of Pakistan. List of floods should instead be redirected to List of natural disasters in Pakistan or List_of_floods#Pakistan. We can try having two featured lists instead of one...right? :P

I would suggests that instead of floods we can replace it with List of Floods.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 09:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

2. Not necessary but I suggest use of footnotes instead for a separate section of 'notes' at the end of each list. See my sandbox to have a look on another list which uses footnotes.

I am thinking about it, after viewing some more articles i will change as you said. Nabil rais2008 (talk) 09:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC) Done ! Nabil rais2008 (talk) 15:22, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

3. Instead of these long heading which seem to be messing up the content menu a liitle, I suggest use of table heading as below:

{| class="sortable wikitable"

|+ <font size="+1">List of cities where 45°C or above but below 50°C temperature was recorded</font>

|-

! Bla Bla Bla !! Bla Bla !! Bla

I think the long headings are correct, in the sense that most articles on Wikipedia have the same trend of long headings where needed.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 09:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

4. I also suggest removing the sortable option from column of 'notes' as below:

! class="unsortable" | Notes

Ok Nabil rais2008 (talk) 09:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Done ! Nabil rais2008 (talk) 14:51, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

5. 'Date' column in third table is taking two lines on my computer screen (don't know about you guys). We can always set the width of columns like below:

! style="width: 12em;" | Date

Ok

6. Another small problem needs to be reported. When we use sortable option of 'temperature' columns. The star thing * messes up the ascending/descending order. See for yourself. The star/footnote needs to be placed at the end of the temperatures.

Done ! Nabil rais2008 (talk) 14:51, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

I don't know if these suggestions would actually help but they might increase reading experience. Farjad0322 ^{(talk|contribs)} 03:31, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

ok, i will check these all problems.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 09:37, 8 September 2010 (UTC)