Wikipedia:Peer review/List of international cricket centuries at Brabourne Stadium/archive1
| Toolbox |
|---|
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because the article is based on similar lists that have Featured List status. The information is complete and as such I am requesting the review to iron out any issues that may be before nom the article for FL status.
Thanks, Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 14:09, 6 March 2011 (UTC)
I wouldn't say this article is too far off at all: in fact, it's probably better than a lot of articles that get nominated straight to FL. That said, I'd prefer that articles come here to be cleaned up first, so fair play!
- I've cleaned up a fair bit of stuff that was just consistency and formatting.
- The caption is unencyclopedic language, 'hallowed turf' specifically. I'd suggest completely rewriting it to be more neutral.
Done RM 'hallowed turf' from the caption. Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 06:41, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Cricinfo references should list ESPNcricinfo as the publisher, not Cricinfo.com. I'd also suggest linking this on the first usage.
Done Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 09:31, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- First reference should have an accessdate, and the title and publisher need to be reversed (with the above change applied too).
Done Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 06:44, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Be consistent in your date format, at times you use Month DD, YYYY, and other times DD Month YYYY.
Done Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 09:31, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- Ref 8 has no publisher listed.
Done Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 06:41, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
- You could do with listing a reference other than Cricinfo at some stage, even if just in some background info on the ground. Relying too much on one source is frowned upon.
Done Iv added refs from Zee News, Indian Express Newspaper and BBC News Around The Globeसत्यमेव जयते 06:41, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Hope this helps! Harrias talk 14:52, 6 March 2011 (UTC)