Wikipedia:Peer review/Mami Kawada/archive3

Mami Kawada[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because the article has been improved greatly since the last peer review. Per numerous suggestions, such as those from the previous two peer reviews, I've added a musical style and influence section, which I feel is healthy enough. A few reviews for her songs were also incorporated into the aforementioned section. Finally, I did a full overhaul of the lede section, and it's now an overall overview of her career rather than just mentioning what anime she has performed songs for. There are still a few flaws I can see with the article, but these are more for reasons beyond my control (a lack of available information regarding her personal life, the article has no images simply because free images of her simply don't exist), etc. Nevertheless, I feel it's on the right track towards Good Article status. Any feedback and further suggestions are appreciated, but the main question is: is it ready for GA class? I want to nominate it only when it is fully ready. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:32, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 05:32, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'd say you can go ahead and nominate it for GA after this peer review. The article has by and far improved since the first time I looked at it, and it appears to be comprehensive based on the sources available for the subject matter. Any minor kinks can be worked out in the GAN process, but I'd say it is ready. Artichoker^[talk] 00:52, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]