Wikipedia:Peer review/Melbourne High School/archive1

Melbourne High School

Hi I think the article should be considered for FA status. It probably needs more references but is comparable with the best high school articles on Wikipedia at the moment. Please comment. --Celendin 12:45, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note... careful with those images! They show students, presumably minors and presumably without their consent, in sufficient detail to be readily identifiable. Bad! Please fix. -- Visviva 14:37, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

B-list images. Uh-uh. :-/ -- Jerry Crimson Mann 15:06, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Low-quality pictures with no copyright information (I suspect they are copyvio), article is mostly lists, no references. Not at all ready for FAC. Christopher Parham (talk) 16:50, 2005 July 17 (UTC)

Images need some information. Please also consider a few header fixes, like de-capitalization. — Stevey7788 (talk) 17:21, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The main logo is pixelated at that size, the other pictures (apart from having no information on their source or copyright status) are also of low quality, some sections are just poorly formatted lists, and the whole thing reads more like a press release for the school than a close-to-FA-worthy Wikipedia article. I'll give credit where it's due to the Institution section (which should probably be renamed to History), but even that's dodgy when there aren't any references. I can see the effort that has gone into it, but it's a bit of a mess at the moment. Extraordinary Machine 21:08, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A source or five might help. --Baron Larf 02:28, July 29, 2005 (UTC)