Wikipedia:Peer review/Microsoft Windows/archive1
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I think it needs general review.
Thanks, Kozuch (talk) 12:21, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)
- Deal with the top tag - citations needed.
- ONE (1)! paragraph (and a short one) for the lead? Check out WP:LEAD. I'd expect at least three, maybe four large paras here.
- Image captions which are fragments shouldn't have periods.
- Fair use rationale needed for ALL fair use images.
- Deal with the [citation needed]'s. There are many.
- "Long File Names"? This is English, not German, so remove those caps!
- "Hybrid 16/32-bit operating systems" section unreferenced completely.
- "64-bit operating systems" also.
- Remove spaces between citations, per WP:CITE.
- Avoid in-line citations as there are in the History section.
- Timeline of releases section is unreferenced.
Basically, cutting a short story shorter, this needs work on prose, citation, WP:MOS and is well short of WP:GA. Work out the basics and then come back to PR (one article at a time) and you never know, GA may be a breeze. Good luck. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:49, 19 May 2008 (UTC)