Wikipedia:Peer review/National Covenant/archive1
National Covenant[edit]
| Toolbox |
|---|
 | This peer review discussion is closed. |
I've listed this article for peer review because I am unused to creating this type of article, and I am unsure what sort of structure or headings it should have. Any other suggestions for improvements appreciated.
Thanks, CSJJ104 (talk) 12:40, 20 September 2020 (UTC)
- I've done a quick copyedit of the article, making some small adjustments for readability and trying to make the lead a bit clearer. Also, reference no. 10 (Goodare 2015) doesn't have a page number - you may have forgotten to add it in. As for the structure, I renamed the last section to consequences, but if you feel original header was better feel free to restore it. Cheers, Jr8825 • Talk 19:53, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jr8825: Thanks for looking :) The heading Significance is better than Legacy, and does seem to match what I was meaning. The p=? in the Goodare reference was added by another editor and I have removed it. The book is a Google book which has no page numbers, would you know another way to indicate the location? CSJJ104 (talk) 21:47, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- @CSJJ104: - I just had a look at the source, and as I'm able to access it via my university I added the page numbers for you. In this case I'm not sure there would've been a way to find the page number via Google Books. Have a check at WP:GBOOKS as sometimes it's possible. Jr8825 • Talk 22:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Jr8825: Thanks for looking :) The heading Significance is better than Legacy, and does seem to match what I was meaning. The p=? in the Goodare reference was added by another editor and I have removed it. The book is a Google book which has no page numbers, would you know another way to indicate the location? CSJJ104 (talk) 21:47, 30 September 2020 (UTC)