Wikipedia:Peer review/Ned Lamont/archive1

Ned Lamont[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I have put a lot of work into this article, and would like to see it become a good article. The subject is a small time politician who lost 1 election and 1 primary, so I'm looking to see if people find it comprehensive enough.

Thanks, Grammarxxx ^{(What'd I do this time?)} 00:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article seems comprehensive, writing style and referencing are good. I made some grammar changes, and merged the ancestry and early life sections. I believe that Lamont began working for the Black River Tribune in 1977, not 1997, but correct me if I am wrong. Second, the caption for the election result does state what election it is for. Is it for the primary or general election. DavidinNJ (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]