Wikipedia:Peer review/Phipps Conservatory and Botanical Gardens/archive1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I've recently expanded it with lots of new pictures and some new information.

Thanks, dllu (t,c) 02:54, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Few minor thoughts:

check the WP:EL guideline; for example [1] should not be linked in text, it should be an internal wiki link
there are paragraphs missing citations, and I haven't checked if the ones with end-of-para cites have refs that covers all the info from a given paragraph
Toker ref should be split into further reading if it is not used as an inline ref
would be good to have a section of its cultural significance for Pittsburgh/Pennsylvania/US

--Hanyangprofessor2 (talk) 03:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]