Wikipedia:Peer review/Postmature birth/archive1
Postmature birth[edit]
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for November 2008.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I need it to be edited for its general quality.
Thanks, HannahSharpe (talk) 00:40, 19 November 2008 (UTC)
- I've done a quick copy edit and added some wikilinks (links of words to other articles put [[]] around the word you want to link), but there are more therms that need links for further information. Only link once per therm per article though.
- In general the article is well sourced. However in a number of places the tone of the writing should be more in line with an encyclopedia and not support page for women for instance: sections "How It's Done" and "What it feels like" and "risks" are not really encyclopedic. Try to write them in a more formal tone.
- How is Post mature diagnosed? Just by noting time after supposed gestation? This not clearly mentioned?
- Is there really nothing know about the causes?
- I guess that apart from not knowing last menstruation also an irregular cycle can result in uncertain determination of gestation, correct?
- In the section "Symptoms", it might be good to indicate that these symptoms can only be seen after birth.
- How is a "Biophysical Profile" performed?
I hope that these comments help. ErikvDijk (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2008 (UTC)