Wikipedia:Peer review/Presbyterian Ladies' College, Sydney/archive3

Presbyterian Ladies' College, Sydney[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because… it was promoted to GA in November and I think it could potentially be an FA, however I am not really sure what else needs to be done to improve it. Would appreciate any suggestions/criticisms.

Thanks, Loopla (talk) 06:47, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Twenty Years Review[edit]

In the lead, it has a reference for the sentence; The Presbyterian Ladies' College, Sydney (P.L.C. Sydney), is an independent, Presbyterian, day and boarding school for girls, located in Croydon, an inner-western suburb of Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.[9], the reference for that is not needed, its not controversial.
In the fees section it states; P.L.C Sydney offers scholarships and bursaries that provide all or part remission of tuition fees to students who are Australian citizens. I think it would sound better with all replaced by full, so it reads; P.L.C Sydney offers scholarships and bursaries that provide full or part remission of tuition fees to students who are Australian citizens.
In the fees section, it states: As with all Australian independent schools, P.L.C is not a full fee paying institution, due to it receiving limited government funding, i think the statement is false, there are schools in Australia that receive no govt funding. Also i dislike the use of the word limited in that sentence, is there a reference for it?
I dislike the quote in the Foundation section of History by the NSW Governor. I think it is too long, and might be better placed elsewhere in the article.
Dislike the list of buildings in the Campus section. Some of them are clearly notable for being heritage listed, but most are clearly non-notable and dont need to be in the article.
Other than that, i think the article is v/good. Probably ready for FAC. Twenty Years 07:37, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 15:18, 5 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]