Wikipedia:Peer review/Rani Mukerji/archive2

Rani Mukerji[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because Rani Mukerji is one of the most accomplished leading actors in India (Hindi cinema), and should thus have a decent Wikipedia article. This page had earlier gone through a peer review, but since then, a lot of positive changes have been made.

Thanks, smaro! 11:06, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

First off, has everything from the previous review been fixed? See here and here. BollyJeff || talk 13:08, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, all of them have been fixed. smaro! 13:39, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Intro - says 12 FF nominations, but filmography shows 14. Sources needed to reconcile/verify.
Intro - says she re-invented herself twice. Really?
Intro - only mentions film career. Maybe a little less of that, and summarize whole article.
Early life - seems a little light on sources.
Early work - source for special jury recognition?
Film career section is very well filled out, but more needed in other work and personal life areas.
File:Laaga Chunari Mein Daagsisters.jpg not needed. There are a lot of pictures, and this one is probably not free.
I will rearrange some text to avoid having a small Controversies section.
Overall pretty good, but not quite GA yet due to lack of full coverage outside of films. BollyJeff || talk 13:34, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestions. I have corrected a few things. The image of LCMD is a free one. Honestly, there isn't much off-screen work to talk about. So I don't know what other information I can add. The only thing I am working on is to include her religious involvement. Other than that, I don't see any other significant topics regarding her personal life. smaro! 15:23, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Also, the number of Filmfare nominations that she has received are 12. The 2 Critics awards that she won don't have additional nominations. smaro! 15:34, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

I see, thanks. Keep looking for more info, after all this is a biographical article, it needs more. BollyJeff || talk 15:54, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of dead links (many from Bollywood Hungama) - it will never pass with all of these. BollyJeff || talk 15:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removed all the dead links. Updated to new and better links. smaro! 12:31, 6 January 2012 (UTC)