Wikipedia:Peer review/San Diego Chargers seasons/archive1

San Diego Chargers seasons[edit]

Article (Edit|History) • Article talk (Edit|History) • Watch article • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.

I've listed this article for peer review because I'm hopful I can get this to FL status.

Thanks,

Buc (talk) 18:10, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from The Rambling Man (talk · contribs)[edit]

en-dash should be used for score separators.
None of the lead is cited and at five paragraphs it's too long.
- Added some refs.
Weird to have two columns with identical content, regardless of the fact they wikilink to different article themes.
- One is the NFL season the other is the teams season. Buc (talk) 17:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - I'm aware of this Buc, that's why I said "they wikilink to different article themes..." - I'm saying it's odd. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Um...ok sorry about that. Buc (talk) 19:23, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why is season column bold and team season not bold?
- NFL season is more notable.
  - It's unclear to the reader why. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - The titles at the top tell you which is which. Buc (talk) 19:23, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      - Featured lists need to be accessible to all, this is unclear, you have two identical columns which have identical contents besides where they wikilink to... The Rambling Man (talk) 19:32, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        Changed headings. Buc (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Some post-season results have citations, some don't. Need to be consistent.
- See References at the bottem.
"(1960–2008, includes only playoffs)" - 2008? where's that on the table?
- The 2007 season's playoffs took place in 2008.
  - Then explain it in the article. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:43, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Check punctuation on all footnotes.
Second EL was retrieved in the future.
- Huh? Buc (talk) 17:50, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - He means the second reference says that it was retrieved in December of 2008 (it should be 2007).
    Gonzo fan2007 ^{talk ♦ contribs} 20:30, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Rambling Man (talk) 18:47, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Think that's everything adressed. Anything else? Buc (talk) 18:30, 31 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR _t 00:12, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]