Wikipedia:Peer review/Scanger/archive1

Scanger[edit]

The article is funny, but is not referenced and perhaps in its current form, doesn't belong in the Wikipedia. --Jason ^(talk) 12:51, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, perhaps a peer review wasn't the Wikipedia process i was looking for. --Jason ^(talk) 12:56, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you're looking for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion? AndyZ 18:39, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen worse. The topic is admittedly not a general encl. article, at least not until such a group (or class) becomes more historically important than this, and much of the writing seems almost tounge-in-cheek enough that it could be a Bad Jokes Candidate, but that's for WP:AFD to recommend. Other parts of it seem pertinent and while it may need a lot of TLC, folks familiar with it's social context (Ireland, the U.K) need to weigh in 'here' before I'd definitely say it should be nominated for deletion. FrankB 02:47, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]