Wikipedia:Peer review/Swanson/archive1

Swanson[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2009.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
Swanson Article is disorganized, I (b64) have edited the Page to look like this. Carlossuarez46 wants it to look like it does now. What does the group think?

Thanks B64 (talk) 04:49, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Finetooth comments: Sorry. As the peer review instructions say, peer review "is intended for high-quality articles that have already undergone extensive work" and that have no major cleanup banners. Peer review is also not the place for dispute resolution. Please consider returning to peer review only after the article is more well-developed and properly sourced. Finetooth (talk) 02:54, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider a Request for Comment to help with dispute resolution, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 03:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]