Wikipedia:Peer review/U2 3D/archive2
U2 3D[edit]
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for March 2009.
This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I have created this article from scratch and been working on it for almost two years and feel as if it is finally complete. I have finished off the to-do list on the talk page and formatted the article countless times to make it among the best articles on Wikipedia, hoping to get it to FA-status soon. Before nominating it for FA-status, I'd like some feedback from the rest of the community on how I can improve the article at this point.
Thanks, –Dream out loud (talk) 02:09, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments from Ealdgyth (talk · contribs)
- You said you wanted to know what to work on before taking to FAC, so I looked at the sourcing and referencing with that in mind. I reviewed the article's sources as I would at FAC.
- What makes the following reliable sources?
- http://www.jambands.com/
- http://digitalcontentproducer.com/
- http://www.zoom-in.com/film-tv/on-the-circuit/on-the-circuit-catherine-owens-u2-3d
- http://www.filmdetail.com/archives/2008/03/04/interview-catherine-owens-on-u2-3d/
- http://www.joblo.com/interview-u2-3d-director
- http://www.movies.ie/html/article.aspx?articleid=1895
- http://www.thecancerblog.com/2006/03/13/u2-cancer-cause-of-vertigo-06-tour/
- What makes the following reliable sources?
- Hope this helps. Please note that I don't watchlist Peer Reviews I've done. If you have a question about something, you'll have to drop a note on my talk page to get my attention. (My watchlist is already WAY too long, adding peer reviews would make things much worse.) 23:37, 15 March 2009 (UTC)