Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Kaiser's crown lilly
Fritillaria imperialis[edit]
Beautiful and great quality, the lighting complements the reds in the flowers' stems and petals very nicely, I think the quality is note-worthy.
- Articles this image appears in
- None yet
- Creator
- Kham Tran
- Suggested by
- I′d※<3※Ɵɲɛ (talk) 03:22, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- Comments
- I'd very much doubt it would have a chance. It's not illustrating the detail of one flower, but then despite being a 'distant' view, it doesn't even illustrate a full plant. Resolution is very marginal. --jjron (talk) 14:05, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think suggesting it in FPC would make the critics there start snarling. I was wondering if anyone else thinks the quality of this is up to snuff for VP. --I′d※<3※Ɵɲɛ (talk) 19:52, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- As far as I know, an image must be in an article for at least a month before it can be a VP. Makeemlighter (talk) 03:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- And as we've tried to tell Tony a number of times, VPC isn't just a consolation prize for failed FPCs. I think the same problems I mentioned above would still be an issue at VPC. --jjron (talk) 16:47, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- As far as I know, an image must be in an article for at least a month before it can be a VP. Makeemlighter (talk) 03:43, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah, I think suggesting it in FPC would make the critics there start snarling. I was wondering if anyone else thinks the quality of this is up to snuff for VP. --I′d※<3※Ɵɲɛ (talk) 19:52, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
- Seconder