Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Tirumala Hills

It is a very nice picture. --Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:53, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested by: Extra 999 (Contact ^me + _contribs) 11:53, 12 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The harsh lighting would kill chances at FPC. Retaking this with less light around is the way to go -- wow could be increased without compromising encyclopedic value. The photographer could also try some tone mapping, but he needs RAWs and additional images at different exposures for that. MER-C 13:10, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I might consider supporting this, the detail in the stone and plants is very good. What I really dislike is how everything seems unnaturally colorful, it almost looks like a cheesy digital rendering. --I′d※<3※Ɵɲɛ (talk) 02:57, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]