Jump to content

Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Archive/September 2008

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This archive contains the peer review requests that are older than one month, have received no response in the last two weeks, are not signed, have become featured portal candidates, or did not follow the "How to use this page" principles in some way. If one of your requests has been moved here by mistake, please accept our apologies and copy it back to the main peer review page with your signature (~~~~).

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


I have had lots of help with this portal, particularly with folks from Wikipedia:WikiProject Gender Studies subproject, Feminism Task Force. 25 Selected articles, all WP:FAs, 35 Selected biographies, all WP:FAs, 27 Selected pictures, all WP:FPs, 20 sets of 3 DYK hooks, all with free-use images, 20 Selected quotes, all with free-use images, and a Rotating In this month section. Things you can do has a cleanup listing, a new feature from WolterBot (talk · contribs), as well as a link to notability concerns, thanks to WP:WPNN.

Looking for any feedback/comments prior to WP:FPORTC. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 23:06, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

After above-given notices, no feedback at the portal peer review for over one month. Cirt (talk) 21:14, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


I've been at this portal for a week or two now and now feel that it's up to scratch. I'm in the process of adding more selected content but I didn't see why a review can't be done at the same time. Any comments would be appreciated. Many thanks --Joowwww (talk) 17:04, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.