Wikipedia:Portal peer review/Denmark/archive1

Portal:Denmark[edit]

I've assited in making numerous improvements to this portal over the past few months including the addition of a new section/component titled "Featured place". I've updated the "featured picture" and "featured article" selections to remove any red links and blank entries, and made general aesthetic improvements to the article. The only concern I have that I think could be looked into is the layout the page; should "topics" be of higher priority than categories?

The portal currently contains selected article and selected biography entries, all of top importance and (as far as I am aware) high quality ratings (C and above). The selected picture box updates monthly, automatically.

I invite any feedback; questions and suggestions. I hope you consider this portal for a revaluation and upgrade. Thank you.

Peter (talk) 22:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Going through PPR, overall: good effort, a few comments. ResMar 17:01, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flying flags are meh; inherent low quality with GIFs.
Of the week? Are you really going to maintain a weekly list forever?
Coordinates shouldn't be included in FP blurbs.
Did you know? needs expansion. Specifically you should have enough material for several 6-hook-long lists. Try wordsearching Wikipedia:Recent additions for "Denmark", "Danish", "Dane".
Purge server cache - why the awkwardly placed text when there is another, bigger, better placed one a few sections above?
Try to avoid recycling colors in portal design - you use black twice, for the borders of the outer border and for the border of the inner elements.