Jump to content

Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Redirect Archives/February 2006

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 1

[edit]
The nominated redirect was deleted. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 15:45, Feb. 7, 2006 The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 22:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The situation here is much simpler: the expression "Polish invasion of Czechoslovakia" is practically never used in the English language in any context. Google shows 6 hits for the expression (see [1])(plus now the Wikipedia redirect as well). To my thinking, redirects do have to adhere to some minimal standard of use, otherwise we will have to allow millions of other redirects that users simply make up. Besides, if anything, it is the participation of the army of Communist Poland in the 1968 invasion of Czechoslovakia by the Warsaw Pact forces which would be brought to mind by this phrase, not the events of 1938. Balcer 00:40, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 22:51, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
These redirects were all deleted. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 15:49, Feb. 7, 2006 The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 2

[edit]

The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 02:06, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirects were deleted. — FREAK OF NURxTURE (TALK) 15:52, Feb. 7, 2006
List of placenames over 20 letters long → Wikipedia:Unusual articles/Places with unusual names
List of places with interesting or unusual names → Wikipedia:Unusual articles/Places with unusual names -- A redirect from the encyclopedia namespace to the WP namespace. Original article was deleted at AfD, but later moved to userspace (and then WP:) after review. I have since removed many links to this article from the mainspace, per WP:ASR. Thanks/wangi 11:53, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 3

[edit]

The nominated redirect was kept, because of opposition to the nomination and the fact that {{rfd}} was not added to the redirect page. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 02:08, 11 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The nominated redirect was speedy deleted. —Cryptic (talk) 02:14, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 4

[edit]
The nominated redirect was kept -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 22:50, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
A new article was written at feederliner by Maury, thanks. -- Jitse Niesen
  • Feederliner → Regional_jet -- Feederliners are many types of aircraft, and are typically turboprops instead of jets Mexcellent 08:02, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Indeed, which is what the article was about when I wrote it a long time ago. It appears that someone has removed the content to some other article, and then turned this into an incorrect redirect. It should NOT be removed, at a minimum it should be pointed to the correct article, or re-instated. Maury 14:44, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Hmmm. I have done some poking about and I can't find anything like my original article at all. The regional jet article may had clipped large portions from it, but the turboprop section is missing. Likewise the regional airline article is about the the companies, not the aircraft. Yet there's nothing in the history of the feederliner article as to what has happened. It was about 5 pages long, I swear! Maury 14:47, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Looks like your feederliner article was merged with regional jets, which then gradually lost all references to turboprops. While some regional jets are feederliners, most feederliners are not regional jets. The worst part of it is there are quite a few articles on turboprop aircraft that mention they are feederliners, but going to feederliner takes you to regional jets, which is silly to say the least and causes the encyclopedia to contradict itself. The ideal solution would have been to not allow the articles to be merged, but that was two years ago, so whaddyagonnado. Delete the inaccurate redirect and move on, I hope. Mexcellent 17:23, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Actually, it's worse than I thought. feederliner AND regional aircraft both redirect to regional jet, which makes no sense at all. If anything, the main article should be regional aircraft, and there should be redirects pointing to that article from feederliner and regional jet. The whole arrangement of feederliner/regional jet/regional aircraft has been slowly edited over a couple of years to the point where the relationships don't make sense anymore. I might fix it. Mexcellent 17:46, 4 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 22:50, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 5

[edit]
The nominated redirect was deleted after merging the page histories. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Aang Cibi → Aang -- This redirect to an animated character profile is practically useless, because it seems to have been born of a mistaken reading. The only occurance I've found of the phrase "Aang Cibi" (beyond pages that refer to wikipedia) is on a fanart site, where the artist has drawn a chibi of the character and mispelled the word itself. This has led to multiple people mistakenly claiming that the character has a surname. However, its page history may need to be merged. --Buinne 06:05, 5 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:22, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 6

[edit]

The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The move was performed as requested because it is unlikely to meet opposition. For further reference, the proper place for requests like this is Wikipedia:Requested moves. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 20:24, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The nominated redirect was kept. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:26, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is a small possibility someone would type it in, and meanwhile it's not doing any harm. Oppose. ··gracefool |☺ 23:12, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The nomination was withdrawn. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 20:24, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 7

[edit]
The nominated redirect was deleted. -GTBacchus(talk) 04:01, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted, after moving the history to Talk:Black metal/Faggoth. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:40, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Faggoth was merged into Black metal, so has to be kept (in some form) for its history. See Talk:Faggoth and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Faggoth. -- Eugene van der Pijll 17:14, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was turned into a disambiguation page, thanks. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 22:39, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:40, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 8

[edit]
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted (and I also deleted Navy NCIS (television)). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 02:03, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

The nominated redirects were all deleted, with thanks to FoN for fixing the copy-past move. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 9

[edit]
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirects were all deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept, because it is a possible typo. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 01:59, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 11

[edit]
The nominated redirect was deleted. I don't know why KWH wants to keep the redirect, but since it is to the category namespace I decided to delete the redirect. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept (no consensus). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept (no consensus). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 07:32, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was nuked. — Feb. 19, '06 [05:02] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was speedied (see above). — Feb. 19, '06 [04:59] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nomination is moot as the move requested by Lord Voldemort has already been performed. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept. The proper solution is to either fix the links or make Nightside into a disambiguation page. Besides, {{rfd}} was not added correctly (after the #REDIRECT …, instead of in front). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:03, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nightside → Mark Elliot -- Might cause confusion. Mark Elliot hosts a show called The Nightside, but there's been a TV series and a Marvel comic by the name of "Nightside", both of which are showing up incorrectly as bluelinks because the incorrect name of this show is redirecting to the show's host. Antaeus Feldspar 07:06, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Turn into a disambiguation page. smurrayinchester(User), (Talk) 14:45, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 12

[edit]
The nominated redirect was deleted, after merging the page histories to satisfy GFDL requirements. According to , Renon is a place with 7000 inhabitants in South Tirol. We can sort it out when a page on this Renon is created; for the moment. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted by User:Android per the Proposed Deletion process. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 13

[edit]
The nominated redirects were all deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:55, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 14

[edit]
The nominated redirect was kept, harmless. Change it into a distinct article at a later date and include a disambuation link to the latter title. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:43] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept, harmless. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:43] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept, harmless. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:43] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was speedy-deleted under G7. Angr/talk 22:00, 14 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was kept, harmless. Turn it into a separate page if we find out "Venedig" might also mean something else. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:43] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
The nominated redirect was deleted, redundant. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:43] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

February 15

[edit]
The nominated redirect was deleted as non-useful, the article does not include the phrase "dragon bus". — Mar. 3, '06 [17:50] <freakofnurxture|talk>
The nominated redirect was deleted cross-namespace, makes no sense. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:50] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Wp:dmexpress → DMExpress -- improper redirect from wp pseudo-namespace (cf. Wikipedia:Namespace#Pseudo-namespaces). Alphax τεχ 14:07, 15 February 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]
    • The nominated redirect was deleted cross-namespace, makes no sense. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:50] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Template messages/Cleanup → User:Cmt.bennett@ntlworld.com/Endoscopic mucosal resection -- User apparently created this page in error; I moved it to his userpage and the remaining redirect should probably now be deleted. Peyna 19:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]


    • February 16

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was kept, harmless, evidently a plausible misspelling. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:57] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The nominated redirect was de1eted, imp1ausib1e typo. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:57] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • Sagemont Lower School1 → Sagemont School -- There is already a redirect at Sagemont Lower School. Chances are that users are not going to randomly add a 1 onto the end of it. Also, page history is not important. --ʀ6ʍɑʏ89 00:12, 17 February 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]
    • The nominated redirect was speedied as an obvious mistake. — Feb. 19, '06 [04:57] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • [Day] → Boxing Day -- Obviously not a helpful redirect. --Russ Blau (talk) 22:35, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, obviously created in error due to a full stop inside the brackets. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:57] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The nominated redirect was deleted, obviously created in error due to quotation marks inside the brackets. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:57] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirects were kept, apparently contain useful history and their existence leaves two less titles available for use as POV forks. — Mar. 3, '06 [17:57] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Arguments for the existence of God → Existence of God -- I've nominated this and the following redirect because a disagreement had broken out over them; one editor had tried to recreate an artcle, another had marked the redirects for speedy deletion, another had removed the speedy tag. At the moment I'm staying neutral, but the criteria for speedy deletion aren't met, so far as I can see. Both were turned into redirects after merging articles as the result of long discussions on their Talk pages. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Arguments against the existence of God → Existence of God -- I've nominated this and the preceding redirect because a disagreement had broken out over them; one editor had tried to recreate an artcle, another had marked the redirects for speedy deletion, another had removed the speedy tag. At the moment I'm staying neutral, but the criteria for speedy deletion aren't met, so far as I can see. Both were turned into redirects after merging articles as the result of long discussions on their Talk pages. Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 09:33, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment: I removed the tags because I assumed the page history was needed following the previous merger(s) as per GFDL. If that's a problem, why not just protect the redirects? -- JJay 09:37, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment I agree with JJay. I looked at the "Arguments for" page and found a detailed history of a merger in July 2005 and all the content is duplicated in "Existence of God." It seems like the "for" and "against" pages should be made into redirects and then protected so they can't be reverted. Thatcher131 12:12, 16 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Oppose, the history needs saved. Protection probably isn't necessary, but wouldn't be harmful in this case. Peyna 00:22, 17 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Comment. It is not necessary to keep the redirects, it is only necessary to preserve the history. That may also be achieved by moving the redirects out of the main namespace, for instance to Talk:Existence of God/Arguments for the existence of God. However, there seems to be no reason to delete the redirects. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:38, 17 February 2006 (UTC)The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.[reply]

    February 17

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was kept as redirect to the disambiguation page, as harmless, and likely useful for links contained in old page revisions. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:03] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 18

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted, apparently nobody cares about it, as this has gone unnoticed for two weeks. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:20] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The nominated redirects were deleted with a few exceptions. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:20] <freakofnurxture|talk>
  • The following emoticon redirects: (*´д｀)(　ﾟ∀ﾟ)彡（；･∀･）（　｀ー´）（　＾∀＾）（｀Д´　）( 、 Ａ ,）（Д｀；　）（　゜∀。）(ﾟДﾟ,, )（☞ 。∀゜）☞（　 ・∀）(｀Д´)(；・∀･)（・∀・　）（・ω・｀ ）（　 ・Ａ・）(･ω･`*)(ﾟДﾟ*,,)（,, ・∀・）(*ﾟワﾟ)(｀･m･´)（ ´ⅴ｀）(´Д｀;)（;´Д｀）(*ﾟ∀ﾟ)(　`Д´)~(^-^~)(~^-^)~( ﾟ Д ﾟ)( ´･ω･)(ﾟДﾟ*)(ﾟДﾟ；)彡∩ﾟДﾟ）(@Д@)(@Д@；)( ﾟ～ﾟ )(*・∀・)(；；ﾟдﾟ)(,,'A`)(・ω・｀ )（ ´・ω・）（　´－｀）（,,｀・ω・）(｀Д´　）(　｡Д｡)(　｡A｡ )ヾ(ﾟ∀。)ﾉｼ（,,,,´・ω・）（；・∀・）(`･ω･´)(´･ω･｀)（´･ω・`） ヽ(`･ω･)ﾉ[[(^.^)/~~~]](*・ω・*)ヾ(･ ω･)ゞ(・(ェ)・；)(*´∀｀*)M0っ(`Д´)(ε･ω･)з(´ﾟЗﾟ｀)((((っ ´ω｀)っヽ(ﾟ∀ﾟ)ﾉ(@∀@-)( ゜э゜)（'A`）(ﾟДﾟ,）(*ﾟーﾟ)（=ﾟωﾟ）(ﾟωﾟ= ）ヽ(・ｅ・ )ﾉヽ(o・-・)ﾉ(ﾟдﾟ,,)(,,ﾟдﾟ)(=ﾟーﾟ)(=^ー^)('A` )('v` )M9（^Д^）(*‘ω‘ *)(￣ー￣)( * ‘ω‘)(( * ‘ω‘)ミ ﾟдﾟ 彡ヽ('A`)ﾉ(*'A`)('A`*)( 'A`)('A`)9mヽ(ﾟ∀ﾟ)ﾉｼ('Ａ`,,)(zAz)(A｀* )(o'ω`o)(`A')（・⊆・ 　）(*　・ )(§ﾟωﾟ)（*´з｀）(；`・ω・）(； ´ﾟωﾟ）( `・ω・）（・ω・´ ）（　’⑪’）（’⑪’　）（　・ω・）(・ω・ 　）（ ○｡｡○）(；　ﾟωﾟ）(,,・∀・)ミ,,・∀・ミ(;;・∀・)(,,；Д；)ﾐ,,；Д；ﾐ(;;；Д；)（*－－）( ´ー`)（・~。・　）( ´～`)( ﾟДﾟ)y━~~(;´Д`)(ﾟ ´Д｀ﾟ )(*^ー^)（. ;´∀｀）（゜Д゜ 　）（｡｡*）(;`･ω･)（・Д・*）（・Д・* ）( ﾟ∀ﾟ)(ﾟ∀ﾟ；)(･ｅ･)（lll´｡．。)（*｡・(･)・)（*・(･)・)（*´・(･)・）(・(･)・｀*)（*・(･)・*) Σ゜lllllＥ(ﾟ- 三ﾟ -ﾟ)(･◎･)（*■㎜■）(*ѿ*)(´・ω・)-/-\O)(^ ^)(~ ~)(- -)(= =)(｢･ω･)｢(｢･Д･)｢(｢･ω･`)｢(｢･∀･)｢从oﾟワﾟ)(｢^ω^)｢ ('Ａ`,;)(`д')(`A')9m(;,'Ａ`)(*；'A`)Σ)ﾟДﾟ)（　゜ ∀゜）（　 ｀ハ´）（´Д｀；　））`Д´（（ ・∀・）（・∀・）（・∀・　)¯\(º o)/¯\(º▽゜)-┌(☼◦☼)┐Β^)B^)(;´∀`)＼（´ｰ｀）ノ≡∆ ∆≡^.^ヽ(｀Д´)ﾉ( ´3`)～♪(・∀・)(ﾟ∀ﾟ)(´ー｀)（ ﾟ∀ﾟ ）（；´Д｀）( ﾟ Д ﾟ )（　Φ Φ）(　｡Д｡ )（ ´・ω・),' 3（　 ´Д｀）（-＿-）(；｀・ω・）（　´∀｀）（＾ω＾；）（　＾ω＾）（,,*´Д｀） （*´Д｀）(,,ﾟДﾟ)(　・Å・)（´Д｀ ）（´Д｀； ）（ﾟДﾟ ）（´Д｀* ）（´Д｀ ;）（*´∀｀*　）（‐∀‐ ,）（　*ﾟ∀ﾟ）（｀Д´）（,,・∀・）(｀･ω･´)（； ´Д｀）('-')（　゜д゜）( ´∀｀)(　 ･ω・)((　・ω)(ω・　))(`･ω･)( ;ﾟ∀ﾟ)(　＾▽＾)( ´ー｀)ミ ﾟДﾟ 彡( *ﾟ∀ﾟ)（　｡ ｡）('A`)（　^∀^ ）（ ;ﾟДﾟ)( ´∀`)（ﾟ∀ﾟ)（ ｀Д´ ）凸(*ﾟ０ﾟ)(ﾉﾟ∀ﾟ)ﾉ（　・∀・）（´∀｀　）（´Д｀　）（　´ ゝ`）(*´∀｀）(* ﾟДﾟ)（ ´Д｀ ）(ﾟдﾟ)(・ω・)(　ﾟдﾟ)(ﾟーﾟ*)(ﾟ0 ﾟ*)（ ●д●）M( )m(`ヘ´)（´・ω・｀）（ ´Д｀）（　ﾟДﾟ）┐('～`；)┌（´∀｀）Σ(゜д゜;)(*´Д`)＇へ＇凸╮ (─▽─)╭（　´Д｀）(　ﾟ∀ﾟ)XPBDXD=)^^;;;P[[/o\]];)=P=/(ﾟДﾟ;)(　´ⅴ｀)ノヽ(´-`)ノ（＊｀Д´）ノヽ(≧д≦)ノ（；￢＿￢）（ー”ー；）（●＾o＾●）ｖヽ(　￣д￣;)ノ(´^ิω^ิ｀)8D¬¬

    • Redirects may be cheap but this is just vandalism. If you need a reason, how about pollution of the namespace, neologism/OR (many of these are unique).  freshgavinΓΛĿЌ  16:07, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

    • I agree completely. I have speedied most of these as patent nonsense, including those which made no sense, did not resemble a face, started and ended with parentheses, or contained untypable characters, but kept some that still seemed ridiculous, but which I have actually witnessed being used on IRC. This leaves us with ^.^, =), ;P, [[/o\]], ;), =P, =/, ¬¬. Note that XP, BD, XD, and 8D are actually disambiguation pages. — Feb. 18, '06 [19:57] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Furthermore, I have also speedied [[/o\]] because of the formating issues in linking to it (you must enter [[<nowiki>/o\</nowiki>]] to avoid being taken to a subpage of the one you are on). — Feb. 18, '06 [20:00] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    Yeah no prob with that. I kind of did a "batch" add there and I didn't really want to judge the 5 out of 300 that I thought might not be so easily removed.  freshgavinΓΛĿЌ  00:14, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • comment if the emoticon appears on the page, I don't see why a redirect doesn't exist for it. And why are emoticons that don't use parentheses "special"? As for non-typable characters, did you notice how many pages use non-ascii titles? Like 2003 UB313, which drops the 313, or stuff with accents, or archaic english letters like Æ ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by who knows? (talk • contribs)
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    This discussion is moot because Kawaii (disambiguation) was not a redirect to start with and has now be deleted by User:Commander Keane because disamb pages with two entries are not needed. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 19:53, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, not useful. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:20] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirects were speedy-deleted under CSD G3 (redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism). -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 15:23, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirects were deleted, usefulness not apparent. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:20] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirects were kept, harmless, and could very easily prevent duplicate articles by clueless newbies. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:20] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 19

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was kept, might aid accidental linking and prevent a duplicate article from being created by mistake. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, not offensive, and does make sense. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept as redirect to List of billionaires. Bill Gates could lose his assets, you never know. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted as a broken redirect. — Feb. 21, '06 [00:00] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, looks plausible to me. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, malformed disambiguator. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted appears to be created in error. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, currently mentioned in first paragraph of the article. If this is not inappropriate, it should be discussed at Talk:Democrat In Name Only, and the presence or absence of a redirect should be match that editorial decision. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, seems to be the wrong frequency. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:35] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • I'm guessing this is a mistake. WSTR (FM) in Atlanta is on 94.1, but it's known just as "Star 94", not as "Star 94.1". However, there appear to be at least three other stations in the U.S. known as "Star 94.1", so I'm going to vote to recreate as disambig page. --Aaron 00:35, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 20

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was kept, useful search term, most likely a high-traffic redirect for anybody unfamiliar with NPOV/political correct article nomenclature of Wikipedia. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:51] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, harmless, nearly synonymous, and might prevent the creation of a duplicate list. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:51] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was redirect List of new religious movements instead (more likely to be the intended link target). — Mar. 3, '06 [18:51] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, no objections, doesn't seem useful either. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:51] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, no consensus, seems harmless. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:51] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted as unlikely search term, and a bit self-aggrandizing as well. — Mar. 3, '06 [18:51] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Deleted by Freakofnurture. -- JLaTondre 23:10, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 21

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted as inaccurate, should probably be a distinct topic, but I'm no chemist. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, implausible search term. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, no objection. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept per [2], seems to be an alternate transliteration and seems harmless. If this refers to a distinct (notable) person, please replace the redirect with an article at some point. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:07] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, not contextually useful. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, very plausible. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, no longer mentioned in the latter article. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, no longer mentioned in the latter article. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    Well, if I removed the actual articles, as this "edit" claims I did, then I can't see my way clear to any objections. --maru (talk) contribs 20:31, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, phrase not mentioned in latter article. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:04] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 23

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted, implausible. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:18] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted as verbose PC-title creep. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:18] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Speedy Deleted by UkPaolo. -- JLaTondre 23:14, 25 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, implausible, probably created in error. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:18] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted and protected, because DRV says so. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:18] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 24

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted, makes no sense. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted not likely. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, cross-namespace. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, unlikely. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, most likely an error. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, most likely an error. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was redirected, Godwin's Law, great idea. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:29] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 25

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted, unlikely. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:37] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Speedy deleted (R2) by Punkmorten. -- JLaTondre 04:28, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Speedy deleted (R1) by Cryptic. -- JLaTondre 04:28, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, harmless. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:37] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    Keep Kind of strange to list it here. AFAIK, it doesn't fall into any criteria for RfD --Barista | a/k/a マイケル | T/C 06:15, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted, poorly formed, probably a mistake. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:37] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. This redirect is confusing because Raszyn and Radzymin seem to be different places in Poland. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 23:28, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 26

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was keep, prominent figure in latter article. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:53] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was keep, prominent figure in latter article. Possibly create a disambiguation page later, as I doubt the other fellows are more notable than JonBenét's dad. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:53] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    • Keep. Your rationale for deletion is exactly why they should be kept. They don't need their own articles so a redirect to where they are actually discussed is appropriate. That's one of the purposes of redirects. -- JLaTondre 14:23, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment:It would be wrong. Two non-notable persons with the same name, listed at Wikipedia:Find-A-Grave famous people/R are not about JonBenét Ramsey's father, and they could be redirect to a wrong article. Their articles have never been created before. It's better to put the redirect up for deletion. Please check "What links here". adnghiem501 06:49, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    I've deleted the blue links of those non-notable John Ramsey at Wikipedia:Find-A-Grave famous people/R. I'm so sorry; I must be confused with my thought, once in a while. The target should be kept. adnghiem501 07:14, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was delete, Dr. Bender is not mentioned in latter article. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:53] <freakofnurxture|talk>
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted by somebody else already. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:53] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was nuked on sight, and so was the article. — Mar. 3, '06 [19:53] <freakofnurxture|talk> The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 27

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was Deleted by grm_wnr as CSD R1. -- JLaTondre 20:33, 1 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was kept, per Kusma. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 08:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirects were all deleted, some speedily by Xaosflux and the rest by me. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 08:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 08:36, 6 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was Deleted by Freakofnurture. -- JLaTondre 02:19, 4 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

    February 28

    [edit]
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:47, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply] The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    The nominated redirect was deleted. -- Jitse Niesen (talk) 10:47, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    Delete per nom. --– sampi (talk•contrib•email) 07:15, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Redirect_Archives/February_2006&oldid=1089797277"