Jump to content

Wikipedia:Reference desk/Archives/Computing/2017 January 26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Computing desk
< January 25 << Dec | January | Feb >> January 27 >
Welcome to the Wikipedia Computing Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is an archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.


January 26

[edit]

Firefox vs large images

[edit]

Yesterday in a heroic feat my Firefox 50.1.0 managed to load and open a 10,380 × 6,719 px image. Sometimes, however, it fails to load even smaller images, today for instance it loaded a 7,360×4,912 px-image only after a second try. Can't figure out why this happens, seemingly cache purging doesn't help and probably internet connection isn't implicated (running on Win 7, 2 GB RAM). Brandmeistertalk 12:54, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That isn't much RAM by today's standards, you might try an upgrade (or a new computer). That's my only guess. I'm having no problems with Win10 / Firefox 50.1.0 / 8 GB. When I want to examine the pupils of Donald Trump's eyes, I view File:Donald Trump official portrait.jpg at full size (4,032 × 5,040). No problem viewing your larger example, although it took 6 or 8 seconds to download (wi-fi). ―Mandruss  13:16, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I've only 1 GB RAM on the machine I'm currently using, and I get a message that your 10,380 × 6,719 px image cannot be displayed because "it contains errors". The next size down displays perfectly. I always blame intermittent internet problems. I've no trouble with the Donald Trump portrait, though it takes a while to load. Dbfirs 13:49, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Flush browser caches STRG+SHIFT+DEL in browser. Else use CCleaner. --Hans Haase (有问题吗) 21:07, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No need, it's working now in just 1 GB of RAM (and still running several other applications), so the problem must have been with the internet connection. I wonder why Brandmeister thinks his internet is not implicated. Dbfirs 21:21, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I was not sure whether it's internet. Brandmeistertalk 20:16, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]