Language desk
< August 20	<< Jul \| August \| Sep >>	Current desk >

Welcome to the Wikipedia Language Reference Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current reference desk pages.

August 21

Trisyllabic laxing

Anyone know of an example for the school → scholar shift? In our article I moved that pair to a section on disyllabic laxing, but now we lack an example for trisyllabic. — kwami (talk) 22:35, 21 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

line → linear? or else incline → inclination? --Lambiam 01:43, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I meant for /uː/ ~ /ɒ/, as is lose ~ lost. I can't think of any which fit the trisyllabic pattern, and the fact that published descriptions keep using 'scholarly' (which is a trivial derivative of disyllabic 'scholar') suggests that perhaps there aren't any. — kwami (talk) 04:57, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Goose, gosling? Bazza (talk) 08:11, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's about tri-syllabic laxing, the /ɒ/ should be contained in the third-to-last syllable. --Theurgist (talk) 08:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Theurgist: Thanks. Something new to learn! Bazza (talk) 08:55, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

True, but goose ~ gosling is an excellent example of disyllabic laxing. School ~ scholar is likely two distinct loan words, whereas goose ~ gosling are cognates, so I'm changing the example. (Still looking for a trisyllabic example, though.) — kwami (talk) 09:44, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That's made my day :-), but I may still be learning how this works. introduce ~ introductory (or the repro- equivalents) has the wrong lax vowel (ʌ) for your request, but is not included as (uː→ʌ) in the table in the article. Does this mean it's not an example of trisyllabic laxing? Bazza (talk) 12:17, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A Greco-Latin written "o" vowel letter does not commonly become pronounced as a vowel sound [u:] except under unusual circumstances ("school" an early loanword not borrowed through French, "zoo" a spelling pronunciation of an abbreviation), so the odds would seem to be against you... AnonMoos (talk) 12:30, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Examples of failed /uː/ ~ /ɒ/ laxing (trisyllabic constipation?): nude ~ nudity; fume ~ fumigate; fury ~ furious. --Lambiam 15:54, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lambiam -- Those words all have or had (depending on which English dialect) a [ju:] pronounciation (not simple [u:]) and are spelled with the letter "u", and so are not too relevant to the issue under discussion... AnonMoos (talk) 19:53, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Another tempting but wrong case is prove ~ providence. Unfortunately, they're not even cognate. I don't think you're going to find an example of trisyllabic laxing (as opposed to other processes) for the reason AnonMoos gave. --ColinFine (talk) 20:06, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, all. I found a source that this is no longer a productive alternation, so I think I'll just leave it at that. — kwami (talk) 22:41, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lose to Lost clearly isn't an example; the o in lost has the darker sound of caught, not the short o sound of cot. Georgia guy (talk) 23:37, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on your variant of English's adherence to the cot–caught merger. In my own, the "o" in "cot" and "lost" is nice and short. Bazza (talk) 08:20, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]