Wikipedia:Requests for feedback/2010 September 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Julia Parnell - Film & Television Producer within New Zealand


Julia Parnell attended Southseas Film and Television School, going on to work at several independent television companies around Auckland, including Touchdown, Screentime and Greenstone Pictures, before becoming the Head of Production at ButoBase Film & TV Company.

She worked at ButoBase for 6 years, producing, directing and providing creative input into more than three hundred television episodes over fourteen series.

In 2010, Julia won the Great Southern Film & Television Woman to Watch Award at the Women in Film and Television NZ Awards, having been a finalist in the same category in 2009.

Parnell left Butobase in early July 2010 to start her own production company, Notable Pictures, and is currently developing a documentary, factual and drama slate.

125.236.208.168 (talk) 05:14, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Request for someone to review Workers (Gong Ren) and remove "unreviewed article" header.[edit]

Hi, I wrote this new article, Workers (Gong Ren), and requested feedback on July 15th. I was hoping someone could look at it and remove the "unreviewed article" header. Thanks very much!


Pyxelator (talk) 05:27, 7 September 2010 (UTC) I have given the article a quick look over and added a couple tags and removed the unreviewed tag. There may be an issue with notability for this specific book and it could a use a break down into sections(Lede, History, Reception). - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 14:12, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have authored an article on the life and work of American Painter Richard Keyes. Can you please give me any feedback before I put it live? Specifically, do I have enough quality references and also, any suggestions as to why one of the images won't show? Thanks for your time!


Jevid (talk) 05:42, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would like some feedback on this page (biography of living composer Theo Verbey) , as I am new to Wikipedia. Much appreciated, and thanks!

Stevey-22 (talk) 07:31, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see it has already been reviewed. To me, not an expert on the subject, it looks to be a very fine article indeed. Congrats, Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:54, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My first Wikipedia article... can someone tell me if it follows standard guidelines? I already checked the guidelines myself, but am looking for someone more familiar with Wikipedia to reassure me that I did it right.

Ahdoot (talk) 08:25, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am new to submitting articles at wikipedia. Please help me improve my submits. Please give me feedbacks on the same

Knowourba (talk) 11:22, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please review the the page for LSTI, thanks you


Qualcomm.Germany (talk) 15:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear colleagues,

After receiving mails from colleagues that found Mycobacterium mantenii in various samples in different parts of the world, I have decided to establish a Wikipedia article for Mycobacterium mantenii, a species in the Mycobacterium family of bacteria. This species was originally described and published by me and my colleagues in the Netherlands and Italy. This is my first full article; I have used lay-outs applied by previous articles on mycobacteria for reference and completeness. I look forward to hearing your suggestions. Sincerely,

Jakko van Ingen

Jvaningen (talk) 16:34, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have received feedback once before and as requested, added several more sources and removed any connotational words. I would like to main it to the main space but am open to any suggestions for improvement.

Houstongal82 (talk) 17:17, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This page describes the purpose and structure of the association as well as general information about Psychiatric Mental Health Nurses. Please provide feedback. Thanks!


American Psychiatric Nurses Association (talk) 20:13, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do I still not have enough sources?

Mcki6534 (talk) 20:23, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your references are still somewhat problematic. Take a look at:
Specific issues
There's something wrong with References 1,4 & 5 - that link is invalid.
The ESPN link is fine.
I've adjusted a few things - a sentence ("Cowboys wide receiver...), that link is not an independent source for the article. Generally links to youtube videos are not considered reliable sources, but in this case I think the information isn't presented elsewhere. Also, inline links are generally against WIkipedia's best articles guidelines. For a full explanation of how inline links should be handled please take a look at: External links explained!.
When you have studied up on the links I've provided above you'll really have a better understanding of what you can do to improve your article. Hope this helps, Shearonink (talk) 22:46, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
PS - I've also removed the 'unreviewed' tag. Shearonink (talk) 23:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please Can review the article about this game... is a complement of my other article of Darkleaf Entertainment... so this is the game developed by Darkleaf...

Actually this game is in development stage so when it will be more complete I'll add more info

Alieneks (talk) 03:47, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alieneks, you need more references, reliable sources from outside references. As of now, the article fails notability. Shearonink (talk) 21:58, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]